CGT - Test


Test Overview

Test objectives were as follows: 

  • Record thrust data for 3 and 10 seconds
  • Record when frost begins to build up on the nozzle
Test Stand
The test stand was built as simple as possible. A single ball valve controlled CO2 flow to the thruster, with high pressure gas coming directly from the CO2 bottle (blow down system). The thrust sat strapped to a wooden block, which was then attached to a drawer slide. This block had a screw that would push on a load cell mounted to a metal bracket. This load cell would record the thrust produced by the nozzle. 



Data was collected from the load cell by filtering and amplifying it with an HX711 circuit board and then logging data through an Arduino serial output. This data was recorded using an open source software called CoolTerm.



Control box (pink box) contained the Arduino and load cell circuit. Control box was also wired to an emergency stop (cardboard box with #10 on it). 



Test Data Observations 


One larger problem became evident during test: the thruster was only meeting half of its designed thrust. Designed to produce at least 20lbs with an injection pressure of 850psi, the thruster was underperforming drastically. While there were temperature deviations between tests, these temperatures never varied more than 5 degrees. Additionally, no obstructions existed within the fluid lines. 

The most likely causes for the underperformance is the following:

1. Choked flow upstream 
The high pressures of the system and cost constraints restricted me to the use of 1/4" tube and flex hose. Unfortunately, the ID of the -04AN fitting on the nozzle was slightly smaller than that of the nozzle's throat. The ID of the flex hose leading the the thruster was also smaller than the throat. 

2. Losses in the flex hose
The flex hose had multiple loops to allow the thruster to move on the drawer slide, it's possible that these bends could have kinked the hose and caused a significant pressure drop before reaching the nozzle. 

3. Insufficient pressure/mass flow rate
This is the most likely explanation. It's possible that the bottle pressure read by my regulator was incorrect or my regulator restricted flow enough in my lines to prevent high thrust levels from being achieved. 





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Welcome! (Resume)

Image
 If you're here, I probably gave you a QR code at UT Austin's Expo! Glad you decided to check out my website. Attached is my resume. Thank you! (Select "Read More" first). Click Here For PDF
Read more

Rocket Kart 2.0

Image
  Why the Change!? The following changes resulted in a large test stand redesign: No longer able to test at FAR Need to make a mobile test stand Stand was over budget, need cost reduction of a few thousand dollars The new design is built around a 275 gallon IBC tote. On test day the tote will be transported to the test site with all of its fluid components already attached. The outer steel frame that takes the load of the engine will be placed under the tote and then the tote will be filled with water to hold everything in place. This design is nice because we don't have to make any modifications to the environment we're testing in and everything can be moved in a U-Haul truck and carried by two or three people.  The P&ID Things to note: Nitrogen purge valves replaced with solenoids Regulators replaced with orifices Small bypass regulator for leak checks Fewer relief mechanisms Thinner propellant and nitrogen lines After remaking my fluids calculator in MATLAB, I found that
Read more

Test Stand for a 1000lbf Kerolox Rocket Engine

Image
  The Project This project is what I like to call Rocket Kart 1.0. It's a test stand built entirely out of 80/20 designed for the capacity of a 1000lbf ablative kerolox rocket engine. Equipped with high flow engine purges, load cells, PTs and TCs and several safety mechanisms, this test stand will serve all kinds of projects for many months to come.  Overview Looking at the stand's P&ID you can see the high flow purges and pressurization system are fed by two 3kpsi GN2 tanks. These feed into the their respective propellant circuits. Given the often unpredictable nature of fluids inside of a 3D printed injector, there are two regulators for each propellant. This will allow the user to control the set pressure of each tank in the event that the pressure drop across the fuel elements is different than that of the oxidizer (which it often is). Moving further down, each tank has redundant relief mechanisms, one burst disc and one relief valve, and a fail open vent in case our st
Read more